What are the Occupy protests really about and what are they doing to create change?
The protests seem to be a response to a long-building slow boil of individual feelings of inequality which have become a part of a more communal consensus. These feelings while generalised, are in response to larger activities such as those performed by Governments, which seem to favour those who are more successful, larger, richer, well-connected, and so on. They are targeted at the “1%”.
The people who are dedicating their time to these movements, who have self-identified as the “99%”, apparently representing the feelings and needs of all of us “everyday folk”, feel that while they represent a group which is the majority, they are not being treated with equality.
The protests are doing their job, in a sense, arousing awareness of the fact that many people are unhappy with their current lot in life, and are willing to do something – drastic, even – about it. However, the movements and their protests are so vague and large that they are not able to effectively create any change.
Perhaps that is okay, if only those protesting could acknowledge the role these demonstrations are playing and work with that rather than to force the protests into a greater role of affecting real, specific change.
This first step is useful in that it signals to others that efforts are going to be made to affect change. Just as in our own individual pursuits of positive change, the next reasonable step should be to create sub groups for each of the specific problems or complaints and work toward specific actionable goals within each of those groups, utilising the passions and powers of those people directly involved in the campaigns. In this way, some groups might begin to see ways in which to affect change, and some changes might actually be made.
However, as things stand currently, the large super groups are beginning to seem disorganised, immature and confused, and no changes are being made because no actionable requests are being made and no real discussions are being had. Instead, this potentially powerful movement has done nothing more than confuse and disappoint the protestors and confuse and infuriate the protested upon.
And nothing positive is happening. Both groups are becoming more exasperated with one another, further decreasing the odds that anything productive will come of all this.
What we must do instead is not to Occupy Wall Street, or to Occupy Toronto or to Occupy any place. What we must do is Occupy Our Lives.
We must be fully present in all of our actions, choices and activities. We must make conscious choices about the things we will buy, the systems we will support, the objections or affirmations we make, the politicians we vote for, the activities we engage in. Large protests might make a fuss, but small actions made by everyone can and will make a difference.
As the majority, it was our voices, our choices and our actions which got us to this breaking point in the first place. Or, perhaps, for many of us, it was our silence, our absence or our inaction which got us here. How many of us can truthfully say that we are satisfied with our own levels of engagement in our own lives, communities and cities? If we are the 99%, we had better start acting like it and take in the full power of this opportunity to create positive change and not just continue to be positively powerless.
Creatively Yours,
























